Asosiy mazmunga o‘tish
Maqola03.00.00Ochiq kirish

STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF EXTERNAL CONDITIONS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE "TPG-SN4" METHANE DETECTOR

Olimov Sardor Mustafayevich, Xasanova Gulbahor RaxmatullayevnaAssistants, Department of Pharmacognosy and Pharmaceutical Technology, Samarkand State Medical University2025

JurnalResearch Focus International Scientific JournalJild 4Son 6Sahifa 32–36

Annotatsiya

Ushbu maqolada «TPG-CH4» metan gaz analizatori ishiga tashqi atrof-muhit sharoitlarining ta‘siri eksperimental tarzda o‘rganilgan. Asosiy e‘tibor harorat, namlik, bosim va boshqa gaz aralashmalari kabi omillarning o‘lchash aniqligi va sezgirligiga ta‘sirini aniqlashga qaratilgan. Tadqiqot natijalariga ko‘ra, harorat +40°C dan oshganda o‘lchash xatoliklari 8-10% gacha ortadi, yuqori namlikda esa sensor ishida beqarorlik kuzatiladi. Shuningdek, boshqa uglevodorodlar mavjud bo‘lganda selektivlikning pasayishi aniqlangan. Kalibrlash ishlari, nisbiy va absolyut xatoliklar hamda chiqish signalining o‘zgaruvchanligi GOST 13320-81 standartlari bo‘yicha baholangan. Tadqiqot natijalari «TPG-CH4» analizatoridan sanoat va laboratoriya sharoitlarida samarali foydalanish uchun avtomatik kompensatsiya va muntazam kalibrlash zarurligini ko‘rsatadi.

Boshqa tillarda

inglizchaSTUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF EXTERNAL CONDITIONS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE "TPG-SN4" METHANE DETECTOR

In this article, the influence of external environmental conditions on the operation of the "TPG-CH4" methane gas analyzer was experimentally studied. The main attention was paid to determining the influence of factors such as temperature, humidity, pressure and other gas mixtures on the measurement accuracy and sensitivity. According to the results of the study, when the temperature exceeds +40°C, measurement errors increase to 8–10%, and at high humidity, instability in sensor operation is observed. Also, a decrease in selectivity was determined in the presence of other hydrocarbons. Calibration work, relative and absolute errors, and output signal variability were evaluated according to GOST 13320-81 standards. The results of the study indicate the need for automatic compensation and regular calibration for the effective use of the "TPG-CH4" analyzer in industrial and laboratory conditions.

o‘zbek«TPG-SN4» METAN GAZ ANALIZATORI ISHIGA TASHQI SHAROITLAR TA‘SIRINI O‘RGANISH

Ushbu maqolada «TPG-CH4» metan gaz analizatori ishiga tashqi atrof-muhit sharoitlarining ta‘siri eksperimental tarzda o‘rganilgan. Asosiy e‘tibor harorat, namlik, bosim va boshqa gaz aralashmalari kabi omillarning o‘lchash aniqligi va sezgirligiga ta‘sirini aniqlashga qaratilgan. Tadqiqot natijalariga ko‘ra, harorat +40°C dan oshganda o‘lchash xatoliklari 8-10% gacha ortadi, yuqori namlikda esa sensor ishida beqarorlik kuzatiladi. Shuningdek, boshqa uglevodorodlar mavjud bo‘lganda selektivlikning pasayishi aniqlangan. Kalibrlash ishlari, nisbiy va absolyut xatoliklar hamda chiqish signalining o‘zgaruvchanligi GOST 13320-81 standartlari bo‘yicha baholangan. Tadqiqot natijalari «TPG-CH4» analizatoridan sanoat va laboratoriya sharoitlarida samarali foydalanish uchun avtomatik kompensatsiya va muntazam kalibrlash zarurligini ko‘rsatadi.

ruschaИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ ВЛИЯНИЯ ВНЕШНИХ УСЛОВИЙ НА РАБОТУ ГАЗОАНАЛИЗАТОРА МЕТАНА « TPG-SN4»

В данной статье экспериментально изучено влияние внешних условий окружающей среды на работу газоанализатора метана «TPG-CH4». Основное внимание уделено определению влияния таких факторов, как температура, влажность, давление и другие газовые смеси на точность и чувствительность измерений. По результатам исследования установлено, что при температуре выше +40°С погрешности измерений возрастают до 8–10%, а при высокой влажности наблюдается нестабильность работы датчика. Также определено снижение селективности в присутствии других углеводородов. Оценены калибровочные работы, относительная и абсолютная погрешности, изменчивость выходного сигнала по ГОСТ 13320-81. Результаты исследования свидетельствуют о необходимости проведения автоматической компенсации и регулярной калибровки для эффективного использования газоанализатора «TPG-CH4» в промышленных и лабораторных условиях.

Kalit so‘zlar

  • Methane detector
  • TPG-CH4
  • external conditions
  • environmental influence
  • measurement accuracy
  • sensor performance
  • gas analysis
  • temperature effects
  • humidity influence
  • cross-sensitivity
  • metrological characteristics
  • calibration
  • reliability of measurements

To‘liq matn

Litsenziya: CC BY 4.0litsenziya matni

Matn PDF’dan ajratilgan va qayta formatlangan; asl nusxadan farq qilishi mumkin.

STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF EXTERNAL CONDITIONS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF THE "TPG-SN4" METHANE DETECTOR Olimov Sardor Mustafayevich, Xasanova Gulbahor Raxmatullayevna Assistants, Department of Pharmacognosy and Pharmaceutical Technology, Samarkand State Medical University https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15664079 Abstract: In this article, the influence of external environmental conditions on the operation of the "TPG-CH4" methane gas analyzer was experimentally studied. The main attention was paid to determining the influence of factors such as temperature, humidity, pressure and other gas mixtures on the measurement accuracy and sensitivity. According to the results of the study, when the temperature exceeds +40°C, measurement errors increase to 8–10%, and at high humidity, instability in sensor operation is observed. Also, a decrease in selectivity was determined in the presence of other hydrocarbons. Calibration work, relative and absolute errors, and output signal variability were evaluated according to GOST 13320-81 standards. The results of the study indicate the need for automatic compensation and regular calibration for the effective use of the "TPG-CH4" analyzer in industrial and laboratory conditions. Keywords: Methane detector, TPG-CH4, external conditions, environmental influence, measurement accuracy, sensor performance, gas analysis, temperature effects, humidity influence, cross-sensitivity, metrological characteristics, calibration, reliability of measurements

ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ ВЛИЯНИЯ ВНЕШНИХ УСЛОВИЙ НА РАБОТУ ГАЗОАНАЛИЗАТОРА МЕТАНА «TPG-SN4» Аннотация: В данной статье экспериментально изучено влияние внешних условий окружающей среды на работу газоанализатора метана «TPG-CH4». Основное внимание уделено определению влияния таких факторов, как температура, влажность, давление и другие газовые смеси на точность и чувствительность измерений. По результатам исследования установлено, что при температуре выше +40°С погрешности измерений возрастают до 8–10%, а при высокой влажности наблюдается нестабильность работы датчика. Также определено снижение селективности в присутствии других углеводородов. Оценены калибровочные работы, относительная и абсолютная погрешности, изменчивость выходного сигнала по ГОСТ 13320-81. Результаты исследования свидетельствуют о необходимости проведения автоматической компенсации и регулярной калибровки для эффективного использования газоанализатора «TPG-CH4» в промышленных и лабораторных условиях. Ключевые слова: Детектор метана, TPG-CH4, внешние условия, влияние окружающей среды, точность измерения, производительность датчика, газовый анализ, влияние температуры, влияние влажности, перекрестная чувствительность, метрологические характеристики, калибровка, надежность измерений

INTRODUCTION: Reliable detection of methane is crucial in various industrial and environmental applications. The TPG-CH4 gas analyzer integrates semiconductor and thermocatalytic sensor elements to monitor methane concentrations. However, the accuracy of its measurements can be significantly influenced by external physical and chemical environmental factors. This study aims to explore how such factors affect the analyzer’s performance and proposes optimization strategies.

METHOD An experimental evaluation method was used to study the metrological characteristics of the methane gas analyzer "TPG-CH4" under the influence of various external factors. A series of tests were conducted under laboratory conditions with changes in temperature, humidity, pressure, and the presence of extraneous gases. Parameters such as error margin, sensitivity, and repeatability were recorded for each change in conditions. The device was also calibrated using standard gas mixtures.

The study established that the accuracy of the "TPG-CH4" gas analyzer readings is significantly influenced by external physicochemical conditions.

When the ambient temperature exceeded +40 °C, the measurement error increased up to 8– 10%. High humidity levels (above 85%) caused instability in readings, especially during prolonged exposure. Deviations from normal atmospheric pressure also led to measurement inaccuracies, particularly under reduced pressure. The presence of other hydrocarbons (such as ethane or propane) in the analyzed medium caused cross-sensitivity, reducing the selectivity for methane.

Optimal metrological characteristics of the gas analyzer were observed under the following conditions: temperature of 20–25 °C, humidity up to 70%, normal atmospheric pressure, and absence of interfering impurities.

In laboratory settings, parameters were maintained as follows: test gas temperature at 20 ± 5 °C, atmospheric pressure at 760 ± 30 mm Hg, relative humidity between 40–60%, and power supply at 220 ± 10 V AC. Under simulated field conditions, the test gas temperature ranged from +5 to +50 °C, pressure varied between 600–800 mm Hg, relative humidity extended from 25% to 95%, and the sensor could be inclined at angles up to 30°.

To assess the analyzer’s measurement range and basic error at concentrations of 0–1000 mg/m³ and 0–5. 0%, calibration gases were introduced to the analyzer in a specific sequence (1-3- 5-3-1-5), where each number corresponds to a reference gas mixture with defined component concentrations and ranges (%): No. 1 = 10%, No. 3 = 50%, No. 5 = 95%.

The primary absolute error at each calibration point was calculated using the formula: C = Ai – A₀ (Equation 5. 1) where Ai represents the measured concentration indicated by the analyzer at a given test point, and A₀ is the actual concentration specified in the reference gas certificate.

To quantify the relative error, the following expression was used: C = (Ai – A₀) / (Ck – Cn) (Equation 5. 2) where Ck and Cn denote the upper and lower bounds of the analyzer’s measurement range for the gas component, in mg/m³ or %.

Tables 1 and 2 provide data on how the PTG-CH₄ analyzer’s signal output correlates with methane concentration within its specified measurement ranges.

Table 1. Dependence of the signal of the PTG-CH4 gas analyzer with a semiconductor sensor on the concentration of methane in the range of CH4 0-1000 mg/m3 CH4 content in the Found СН4 S Sr*102 mixture, mg/m3 (x± x), mg/m 3

50 48±0. 9 0. 72 1. 5 250 245±1. 5 1. 21 0. 5 500 510±2. 0 1. 61 0. 3 750 740±2. 8 2. 25 0. 3 980 973±4. 8 3. 86 0. 4

Table 2. Results of checking the measurement range of the PTG-CН4 gas analyzer with a thermocatalytic sensor (measurement range 0-5. 0% vol. ) (n=5,P=0. 95. ) CH4 introduced, Found CH4, S Sr*102 % vol. (x± x), % vol. 0. 10 0. 97±0. 02 0. 02 1. 7 0. 50 0. 45±0. 06 0. 05 1,1 1. 50 1. 54±0. 09 0. 07 2. 7 2. 50 2. 56±0. 16 0. 13 2. 5 3. 50 3. 41±0. 15 0. 12 2. 5 4. 50 4. 43±0. 19 0. 15 2. 4 4. 90 4. 95±0. 21 0. 17 2. 4

The data presented indicate that, within the tested concentration ranges, the gas analyzer’s output signal shows a linear relationship with carbon monoxide concentration The analyzer is deemed to meet performance criteria if, at each concentration level, the following condition is satisfied: B < B₉, where B₉ represents the permissible signal variation threshold. As shown in Table 3, the observed variation in the gas analyzer's readings remains within 50% of the allowable basic error across all measurement intervals, which is consistent with the limits established by GOST 13320-81. In fact, the recorded variations do not exceed 0. 5 of the absolute value of the permissible basic error, indicating high signal consistency. Table 3. Results of determining the signal variation of the PTG-CH4 gas analyzer (n=5, P=0. 95) Methane content in Methane found(x± x), % Basic abs. Variation, the mixture, % vol. vol. pogresh % Amax Amin ity 0. 55 0. 45±0. 02 0. 46±0. 02 0. 05 0. 01 2. 45 2. 51±0. 03 2. 49±0. 04 0. 06 0. 02 4. 86 4. 91±0. 04 4. 89±0. 03 0. 05 0. 02

To evaluate the influence of ambient temperature variations on the PTG-CH₄ analyzer's performance, tests were conducted across a temperature range of 10 °C to 50 °C. A gas sample containing 2. 85% methane was used during these trials. The temperature in the test chamber was adjusted sequentially, starting from the baseline of +20 °C—identified as the optimal point for assessing the primary error—followed by settings at 10 °C, 35 °C, and 50 °C. At each temperature level, the analyzer was allowed to stabilize for one hour before the test gas was introduced and readings were recorded. Each temperature condition was tested at least three times to ensure consistency.

To investigate the impact of humidity on the device’s performance, a series of experiments were conducted using the following procedure: the gas analyzer was first placed inside a controlled humidity chamber, where standard testing conditions were initially established. Once the system stabilized, the baseline error of the analyzer was measured using a gas sample (GS) containing 2. 55% carbon monoxide by volume. After one hour, the same gas sample was passed through a series of three interconnected Tishchenko bottles filled with distilled water, which humidified the gas up to 95% before entering the analyzer. The error under high-humidity conditions was then recorded. Following this phase, the gas analyzer was turned off, and standard ambient conditions were restored. After a two-hour stabilization period, the device was powered back on, and its baseline error was rechecked under normal conditions. As a result of the study conducted, a novel approach has been introduced to enhance the selectivity of methane detection through thermocatalytic methods. This approach involves integrating both semiconductor and thermocatalytic sensing elements into a unified system, utilizing catalysts that exhibit minimal activity toward other components present in the analyzed gas mixture. The measurements of absolute and relative errors, along with signal variability, remained within acceptable thresholds defined for standard conditions in accordance with GOST 13320-81 CONCLUSION The metrological characteristics of the "TPG-CH4" methane gas analyzer are significantly affected by external environmental factors. Temperature, humidity, and the composition of the gas mixture have the greatest impact. To ensure reliable results, it is necessary to conduct regular calibration of the device, apply correction factors when operating under non-standard conditions, and follow the manufacturer's recommended operational parameters. During the experimental phase, the operational concentration ranges of the target gas were established, along with evaluations of the primary measurement error, output signal variation, and potential additional errors due to environmental factors such as temperature, pressure, and humidity. The PTG-CH₄ gas analyzers were tested within methane concentration intervals of 0– 1000 mg/m³ and 0–5. 0% by volume, both under controlled laboratory settings and simulated operational conditions.

Iqtiboslar dinamikasi

Bu ilmiy ishga ReLibrary’da chop etilgan ilmiy ishlarda hali iqtibos topilmadi.

ReLibraryTekshirilgan Metodologiya

Adabiyotlar19 ta adabiyot

  1. Эшкобилова М. Э. , Метрологические Характеристики Полупроводникового Сенсора Оксида Углерода. , Journal Of Healthcare And Life-Science Research Vol. 4, No. 2, 2025 Issn: 2181-4368. , Https://Jhlsr. Innovascience. Uz/Index. Php/Jhlsr
  2. Ergashboy A. Eshkobilova Mavjuda. Zol-Gel Synthesis Of Nanocomposites And Gaseous Materials //The International Conference On" Energy-Earth-Environment-Engineering". Ctp. – 2023. – С. 84-85.
  3. Eshkobilova M. E. , Khudoyberdieva F. B. Composition And Structure Of Composite Building Materials //International Journal Of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research Issn: 2277-3630 Impact Factor: 8. 036. – 2023. – Т. 12. – №. 01. – С. 1-4.
  4. Gulomovna S. X., Ergashboyevna E. M., Ergashboy A. Range Of Measuring Of Base Error Of Selective Thermocatalytical Sensor On Methane //European Science Review. – 2020. – №. 1-2. – С. 140-143.
  5. Ergashboyevna E. M. , Gulomovna S. X. , Ergashboy A. Selective Thermocatalytic Sensor For Natural Gas Monitoring //Austrian Journal Of Technical And Natural Sciences. – 2019. – №. 9-10. – С. 49-51.
  6. Эшкобилов Ш. А. , Эшкобилова М. Э. , Абдурахманов Э. А. Определение Природного Газа В Атмосферном Воздухе И Технологических Газах //Экологические Системы И Приборы. – 2015. – №. 9. – С. 11-14.
  7. Eshkobilova M. E. , Хodieva N. , Abdurakhmanova Z. E. Thermocatalytic And Semiconductor Sensors For Monitoring Gas Mixtures //World Journal Of Agriculture And Urbanization. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. 6. – С. 9-13.
  8. Эшкобилова М. Э. , Насимов А. М. Газоанализатор (Тпг-Сн4) Для Мониторинга Метана На Основе Термокаталитических И Полупроводниковых Сенсоров //Universum: Химия И Биология. – 2019. – №. 6 (60). – С. 17-20.
  9. Эшкобилова М. Э. И Др. Метанни Аниқловчи Тяг-Cн4 Газ Анализаторининг Метрологик Тавсифларига Турли Омилларнинг Таъсири //Research Focus. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. 11. – С. 17-22.
  10. Абдурахманов Э. Д. , Сидикова Х. Г. , Эшкобилова М. Э. Катализатор Для Селективного Сенсора Метана //Евразийский Союз Ученых. Серия: Медицинские, Биологические И Химические Науки. – 2021. – №. 4. – С.
  11. M. A. , Abduraxmonova Z. E. , Eshkobilova M. E. Gazlar Aralashmasi Tarkibini Nazorat Qilishning Elektrokimyoviy Usullari Va Analizatorlari //Research Focus. – 2024. – Т. 3. – №. 5. – С. 8-13.
  12. Abdurakhmanov E. Et Al. Template Synthesis Of Nanomaterials Based On Titanium And Cadmium Oxides By The Sol-Gel Method, Study Of Their Possibility Of Application As A Carbon Monoxide Sensor (Ii) //Journal Of Pharmaceutical Negative Results. – 2022. – Т. 13. – С. 1343-1350.
  13. Abdurakhmanov E. Et Al. Development Of A Selective Sensor For The Determination Of Hydrogen //Iop Conference Series: Earth And Environmental Science. – Iop Publishing, 2021. – Т. 839. – №.
  14. Сидикова Х. Г. , Эшкобилова М. , Абдурахмонов Э. Термокаталитический Сенсор Для Селективного Мониторинга Природного Газа //Vi-Международные Научные Практической Конференции Global Scien Ceand Innovations. – 2019. – С. 235-238.
  15. Eshkabilova M. Et Al. Development Of Selective Gas Sensors Using Nanomaterials Obtained By Sol-Gel Process //Journal Of Physics: Conference Series. – Iop Publishing, 2022. – Т. 2388. – №.
  16. Абдурахманов Э. И Др. Химический Сенсор Для Мониторинга Оксида Углерода Из Состава Транспортных Выбросов //Science And Education. – 2020. – Т. 1. – №. 1. – С. 37-42.
  17. Эшкобилов Ш. А. , Эшкобилова М. Э. , Абдурахманов Э. А. Разработка Катализатора Для Чувствительного Сенсора Природного Газа //Символ Науки. – 2015. – №. 3. – С. 7-12.
  18. Komiljonovna M. M. , Safarovich T. O. , Ergashboyevna E. M. Gidrazidlarning Biologik Faolligi Fosforlangan Karboksilik Kislotalar Va Ularning Hosilalari //Ta'limda Raqamli Texnologiyalarni Tadbiq Etishning Zamonaviy Tendensiyalari Va Rivojlanish Omillari. – 2024. – Т. 31. – №. 2. – С. 126-130.
  19. Eshkobilov Sh A., Eshkobilova M. E., Abdurakhmanov E. Determination Of Natural Gas In Atmospheric Air And Technological Gases //Ecological Systems And Devices. – 2015. – Т. 9. – С. 11-5.

Metama’lumot

Identifikator
REL-A-012994
Nashr sanasi
2025-07-06
Til
inglizcha
Jurnal
Research Focus International Scientific Journal
Jild
4
Son
6
DOI
10.66073/researchfocus.v4i6.1669
ISSN
2181-3833 · 2181-3833
Nashriyot
LLC Ilm-fan va innovatsiyalar akademiyasi
Sahifa
32–36
Litsenziya
Ushbu ilmiy ish CC BY 4.0 litsenziyasi asosida ochiq.
Ko‘rishlar
12026-10-10 dan beri o‘lchanmoqda
Metadata manbasi
Research Focus International Scientific Journal
Oxirgi yangilanish
2026-09-06