Asosiy mazmunga o‘tish
ReLibrary
UZ
Kirish
Maqola14.00.00Ochiq kirish

PROPHYLAXIS EFFICACY OF THE PREPARATION BASED ON “FAGODENT” AND “TRAUMEL S” IN DENTAL IMPLANTOLOGY

Ismatov Farrukh Aslidinovich1, Bekmurodov Lukmon Rustamovich1, Ibodov Ulmas Ergash ugli22025

  1. 1PhD, assistant teacher of the department of Oral surgery and dental implantology, Samarkand State Medical University, Samarkand, Uzbekistan
  2. 2Master‘s student of the department of Oral surgery and dental implantology, Samarkand State Medical University, Samarkand, Uzbekistan

JurnalResearch Focus International Scientific JournalJild 4Son 3Sahifa 170–176

Annotatsiya

Ushbu maqolada dental implantologiyada «Fagodent» va «Traumel S» preparatlarining profilaktik samaradorligi o‘rganilgan. Ushbu preparatlar asosan implantatsiya muolajasidan keyin yuzaga keladigan yallig‘lanish, infeksiya va og‘riqni kamaytirish, shuningdek shikastlangan to‘qimalarning tiklanishini tezlashtirish uchun qo‘llaniladi. «Fagodent» o‘simlik asosidagi antibakterial va yallig‘lanishga qarshi ta‘siri bilan ajralib tursa, «Traumel S» bir qator xususiyatlari orqali immun tizimini qo‘llab-quvvatlaydi va sog‘ayishni tezlashtiradi. Maqolada har ikkala preparatning klinik samaradorligi ko‘rsatilgan va ularning birgalikda qo‘llanilishi implantatsiya muolajasining muvaffaqiyatli amalga oshirilishiga qanday yordam berishi tahlil qilingan.

Boshqa tillarda

inglizchaPROPHYLAXIS EFFICACY OF THE PREPARATION BASED ON “FAGODENT” AND “TRAUMEL S” IN DENTAL IMPLANTOLOGY

This article studies the prophylactic efficacy of the preparations “Fagodent” and “Traumel S” in dental implantology. These preparations are mainly used to reduce inflammation, infection and pain after the implantation procedure, as well as to accelerate the recovery of injured tissues. “Fagodent” is characterized by its plant-based antibacterial and anti-inflammatory effect, while “Traumel S” supports the immune system through a number of its properties and accelerates recovery. The article shows the clinical efficacy of both preparations and analyzes how their combined use helps in the successful implementation of the implantation procedure.

o‘zbekDENTAL IMPLANTOLOGIYADA «FAGODENT» VA «TRAUMEL S» ASOSIDAGI PREPARATLARNING PROFILAKTIK SAMARADORLIGI

Ushbu maqolada dental implantologiyada «Fagodent» va «Traumel S» preparatlarining profilaktik samaradorligi o‘rganilgan. Ushbu preparatlar asosan implantatsiya muolajasidan keyin yuzaga keladigan yallig‘lanish, infeksiya va og‘riqni kamaytirish, shuningdek shikastlangan to‘qimalarning tiklanishini tezlashtirish uchun qo‘llaniladi. «Fagodent» o‘simlik asosidagi antibakterial va yallig‘lanishga qarshi ta‘siri bilan ajralib tursa, «Traumel S» bir qator xususiyatlari orqali immun tizimini qo‘llab-quvvatlaydi va sog‘ayishni tezlashtiradi. Maqolada har ikkala preparatning klinik samaradorligi ko‘rsatilgan va ularning birgalikda qo‘llanilishi implantatsiya muolajasining muvaffaqiyatli amalga oshirilishiga qanday yordam berishi tahlil qilingan.

ruschaПРОФИЛАКТИЧЕСКАЯ ЭФФЕКТИВНОСТЬ ПРЕПАРАТОВ НА ОСНОВЕ «ФАГОДЕНТ» И «ТРАУМЕЛЬ С» В ДЕНТАЛЬНОЙ ИМПЛАНТОЛОГИИ

В статье рассматривается профилактическая эффективность препаратов «Фагодент» и «Траумель С» в дентальной имплантологии. Эти препараты в основном используются для уменьшения воспаления, инфекции и боли, возникающих после процедуры имплантации, а также для ускорения восстановления поврежденных тканей. «Фагодент» характеризуется антибактериальным и противовоспалительным действием на растительной основе, а «Траумель С» поддерживает иммунную систему и ускоряет выздоровление благодаря ряду свойств. В статье демонстрируется клиническая эффективность обоих препаратов и анализируется, как их совместное применение способствует успешному процессу имплантации.

Kalit so‘zlar

  • implant
  • peri-implant tissues
  • mucositis
  • inflammation
  • bone resorption
  • oral hygiene
  • gingivitis

To‘liq matn

Litsenziya: CC BY 4.0litsenziya matni

Matn PDF’dan ajratilgan va qayta formatlangan; asl nusxadan farq qilishi mumkin.

PROPHYLAXIS EFFICACY OF THE PREPARATION BASED ON “FAGODENT” AND “TRAUMEL S” IN DENTAL IMPLANTOLOGY Ismatov Farrukh Aslidinovich PhD, assistant teacher of the department of Oral surgery and dental implantology, Samarkand State Medical University, Samarkand, Uzbekistan E-mail:farruxismatov87@gmail.com ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6424-0489 Bekmurodov Lukmon Rustamovich PhD, assistant teacher of the department of Oral surgery and dental implantology, Samarkand State Medical University, Samarkand, Uzbekistan Ibodov Ulmas Ergash ugli Master’s student of the department of Oral surgery and dental implantology, Samarkand State Medical University, Samarkand, Uzbekistan https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15133608 Abstract: This article studies the prophylactic efficacy of the preparations “Fagodent” and “Traumel S” in dental implantology. These preparations are mainly used to reduce inflammation, infection and pain after the implantation procedure, as well as to accelerate the recovery of injured tissues. “Fagodent” is characterized by its plant-based antibacterial and anti-inflammatory effect, while “Traumel S” supports the immune system through a number of its properties and accelerates recovery. The article shows the clinical efficacy of both preparations and analyzes how their combined use helps in the successful implementation of the implantation procedure. Keywords: implant, peri-implant tissues, mucositis, inflammation, bone resorption, oral hygiene, gingivitis.

ПРОФИЛАКТИЧЕСКАЯ ЭФФЕКТИВНОСТЬ ПРЕПАРАТОВ НА ОСНОВЕ «ФАГОДЕНТ» И «ТРАУМЕЛЬ С» В ДЕНТАЛЬНОЙ ИМПЛАНТОЛОГИИ Аннотация: В статье рассматривается профилактическая эффективность препаратов «Фагодент» и «Траумель С» в дентальной имплантологии. Эти препараты в основном используются для уменьшения воспаления, инфекции и боли, возникающих после процедуры имплантации, а также для ускорения восстановления поврежденных тканей. «Фагодент» характеризуется антибактериальным и противовоспалительным действием на растительной основе, а «Траумель С» поддерживает иммунную систему и ускоряет выздоровление благодаря ряду свойств. В статье демонстрируется клиническая эффективность обоих препаратов и анализируется, как их совместное применение способствует успешному процессу имплантации. Ключевые слова: имплантат, периимплантные ткани, мукозит, воспаление, резорбция костной ткани, гигиена полости рта, гингивит.

INTRODUCTION In the field of dental implantology, in order to ensure high efficiency in tooth restoration, the implantation process must be successfully carried out. However, it is important to maintain the health of patients and prevent complications after surgery. To achieve this, it is necessary to use various drugs and tools, facilitate the post-surgical recovery period, prevent infections and reduce inflammation.

This article analyzes the preventive effectiveness of the drugs "Fagodent" and "Traumeel S" in dental implantology. "Fagodent" is a biologically active drug based on plant extracts, and its antibacterial and anti-inflammatory effects help reduce complications that occur after the implantation procedure. "Traumeel S" has a number of properties, including reducing swelling and pain, and accelerating recovery after the surgical procedure by strengthening the immune system. It is known that complications such as infection and inflammation during dental implantation can slow down the patient's recovery process and negatively affect the success of the implantation. Therefore, the use of "Fagodent" and "Traumel S" drugs can be effective not only in reducing complications, but also in improving the overall health of the patient. The article reviews in detail the clinical efficacy of these drugs, their combined use, and their role in the implantation process. THE MAIN PART The drug "Traumel S" based on phagocytes has a prophylactic value in relation to inflammatory complications of the peri-implant gingiva. (Table 1). Thus, in the op group, with the use of Traumel S gel at home and at the end of annual professional hygiene, peri-implantitis did not develop, and in the kP group, with conventional observation, after three years, peri-implantitis developed in one case (1.8%). Mucositis developed in both groups, but was more pronounced in the control group. When using Traumel S gel at 1, 2, 3 years of follow-up, mucositis was detected in 2, 2 and 3 implants (2.2%, 2.2%, 3.4%). In the control group, mucositis developed more often: 1, 2, 3 years - 4, 3, 5 implants (7.2%, 5.4%, 8.9%) (Fig. 2). The difference between the number of mucositis in the main and control groups at 1, 2, 3 years of follow-up was 69.4%, 38.9%, 61.8%. Before the start of orthopedic treatment on implants, the oral hygiene index (vagP-u) in general was 2.0±0.2 points in the main and control groups; after the end of prosthetics (against the background of professional hygiene before prosthetics) games-u were 1.7±0.3 and 1.6±0.3; a year later, during the control examination, it was up to 1.9±0.1 in the main group, 2.1±0.2 in the control group; after 2 years, hygiene was 2.1±0.2 and 2.3±0.3 in the main and control groups; after three years, 2.3±0.3 and 2.5±0.3, respectively. The difference in the indicator for years 1, 2 and 3 is 13.6%, 8.7%, 8.0%. The gingivitis index of the IGIM was worse in the control group after 1,2, 3 years, since in this group it corresponded to 1.3±0.3, 1.5±0.2, 1.5±0.2, and when using Traumel s gel, the main one was 1.0±0.1, 0.9±0.1, 1.0±0.2, which is less than in the KP group by 25.4%, 41.4%, 33.3%. The gingivitis index of the IGIM was not determined before and after the completion of prosthetics in the main and control groups, after 1.2, 3 years its values when using Traumel s gel were 0.1±0.1, 0.2±0.1, 0.3±0.2; in the control group, respectively, 0.2±0.1, 0.4±0.2, 0.4±0.2. Between the OP and KP groups, the values were 1.2, 3 the difference during the annual follow-up was 50.0%, 50.0%, 25.0%. The Mulleman index was not determined before and after orthopedic treatment, and during the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd year of follow-up it did not exceed 0.1-0.2±0.1 in the main group of preventive follow-up and increased from 0.1±0.1 in the first year of follow-up to 0.3±0.1 in the second year and to 0.4±0.1 in the third year. The difference during follow-up was 0.0%, 33.3%, 50.0%, respectively (Fig. 28,29). Dynamics of clinical and index indicators of peri-implant tissues during prophylactic use of Traumeel s gel (op and KP groups)

1 year 2 year 3 year Indicators oP KP oP KP oP kp development of mucositis, % 2,2 7,2 2,2 5,4 3,4 8,9 development of peri-implantitis, % 0 0 0 0 0 1,8

development of bone resorption, % 0 0 0 0 0 1,8

vagP-u 1,9 2,1 2,1 2,3 2,3 2,5 Igim 1,0 1,3 0,9 1,5 1,0 1,5 VaG 0,1 0,2 0,2 0,4 0,3 0,4 Mulleman Index 0,1 0,1 0,1 0,3 0,2 0,4

1-tab. Dynamics of the patient's X-ray picture H (after the completion of prosthetics and after 3 years with prophylactic use of Traumeel s gel.

1-fig. Difference between oral hygiene and peri-implant dental condition index assessment after 1, 2, 3 years in the main (op) and control (CP) groups.

New cases of mucositis were detected in the groups with the initial presence of mucositis over the three years: in the olm group, 0, 1 and 2 cases were monitored for 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively, which corresponds to 0%, 2.1% and 4.3% of the observations in this group. In the control group, the increase in the number of mucositis cases during the specified time period occurred in the amount of 1, 2, 2 cases (in the KLM group 2.9%, 5.8%, 5.8%). The difference in the development of new cases of olm and KLM mucositis during the reference periods of monitoring is 100.0%, 63.8% and 25.9%. In the group with the initial presence of mucositis for 1, 2, 3 years, the therapeutic use of Traumeel s gel was accompanied by a relapse of inflammation in 2, 3 and 3 cases (4.3%, 6.4%, 6.4%, respectively), and in the ClM group the recurrence rate was 14.3%, 11.4% and 17.1% (5, 4, 6 cases). The difference in the control period between the Olm and KLM groups was 69.9%, 43.9%, 62.6%, respectively (Tables 2, 3).

LM/ KLM P / KLP Indicators 1 year 2 year 3 year 1 year 2 year 3 year 0/3,0 development of 0/2,9 2,1/5,8 4,3/5,8 0/6,1 3,2/3,0 periimpla mucositis, % ntit development, % 0/5,7 2,1/8,6 4,3/11,4 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/6, 1

relapse of chronic 4,3/14,3 6,4/11,4 6,4/17,1 5,1/9,1 2,6/9,1 5,1/12,1 inflammation, %

development of bone 2,1/8,6 7,0/14,3 8,5/20,0 10,3/15,2 18,0/24,2 25,6/27,3 resorption, %

average time to 3,6/4,2 day 5,9/7,3 relieve inflammation 2-tab. Dynamics of clinical indicators of peri-implant tissues when using Traumeel s gel for the treatment of mucositis (olm and KLM groups) and peri-implantitis (ol P and Cl p groups)

Comparison of inflammatory complications and recurrence rates of inflammation in the main (olm) and control (KLM) groups in the presence of initial mucositis. The development of peri-implantitis in the main group occurred in 1 implant after 2 years, and in 2 implants after 3 years (2.1% and 4.3%, respectively); in the control group, mucositis progressed to peri-implantitis in 2, 3, 4 implants after 1, 2, 3 years (5.7%, 8.6%, respectively). 11.4%), compared to the KLM group, 100.0%, 75.6% and 62.3%. The occurrence of bone resorption is more frequent than inflammatory manifestations: during the control period of 1, 2, 3 years, in the olm group, b resorption for the implant zone was recorded in implants 1, 3, 4, and in the ClM group - in 3, 5, 7, which is 2.1%, 7.0%, 8.5% and 8.6%, respectively.% , 14.3%, 20.0%; in the KLM group, the increased frequency of detection of resorption was 75.6%, 51.0% and 57.5%.

When using Traumeel s gel for the treatment of mucositis, the average duration of peri-implant gum recession was 3.6±0.7 days, compared to 4.2±1.0 days in the control group, which is 14.3% longer. Mucositis progression relapse XP. Progression. Resorptions, periimplantitis inflammation bone inflammation. tk. □ 1 year EZ 2 years and 3 years The difference between the initial presence of mucositis and the rate of inflammatory complications and recurrence of inflammation in the main (olm) and control (KLM) groups after 1, 2, 3 years. In the Olm and KLM groups, the hygiene index was on average unsatisfactory before vagR-u treatment - 2.8±03; after professional hygiene and treatment of mucositis, hygiene improved in the KLM group by 1.7±0.2 and in the Olm group by 1.2±0.2 due to the use of Fagodent gel (difference 29.4%). After 1, 2, and 3 years of playing, it gradually deteriorated: 1.7±0.3, 1.8±0.3, 2.0±0.2 in the OLM group and 2.2±0.4, 2.4±0.3, 2.5±0.4 in the KLM group, respectively (difference between groups 29.4%, 22.7%, 25.0%, 20.0%). CONCLUSION This article studies the prophylactic efficacy of the drugs "Fagodent" and "Traumel S" in dental implantology. Both drugs are used as effective means to accelerate the patient's recovery, prevent infections and reduce inflammation in the period after the implantation procedure. "Fagodent" has antibacterial, anti-inflammatory and tissue regeneration properties based on plant extracts, while "Traumel S" with its homeopathic composition strengthens the immune system, reduces swelling and pain, and facilitates the postoperative period. The combined use of these drugs can increase the success of the implantation procedure and shorten the patient's recovery period. Clinical studies and practical experience show that the drugs "Fagodent" and "Traumel S" are highly effective in dental implantology, play an important role in reducing complications for patients and improving overall health. Thus, the drugs "Fagodent" and "Traumel S" are recommended as effective means of increasing the preventive effectiveness of the dental implantation process, their use helps to make the implantation procedure more successful and safer for patients.

Iqtiboslar dinamikasi

Bu ilmiy ishga ReLibrary’da chop etilgan ilmiy ishlarda hali iqtibos topilmadi.

ReLibraryTekshirilgan Metodologiya

Adabiyotlar36 ta adabiyot

  1. Шодиев, С. С., Исматов, Ф. А., Нарзиева, Д. Б., Тухтамишев, Н. О., & Ахмедов, Б. С. (2019). Эффективность Применения Отвара Аниса При Лечении Периимплантитов. Достижения Науки И Образования, (11 (52)), 99-103.
  2. Исматов, Ф. А., Мустафоев, А. А., & Фуркатов, Ш. Ф. (2023). Анализ Эффективности Нестероидных Антивосполительных Препаратов При Излеченье Верхнечелюстного Альвеолита. Theory And Analytical Aspects Of Recent Research, 1(12), 49-57.
  3. Исматов, Ф. А., Шодиев, С. С., & Мусурманов, Ф. И. (2020). Анализ Изучения Стоматологического И Общего Здоровья Студентов Вузов Города Самарканда. Биомедицина Ва Амалиёт Журнали, (6), 34-39.
  4. Хасанова, Л. Э., & Исматов, Ф. А. (2020). Комплексная Социально-Гигиеническая Характеристика Условий, Образа Жизни И Здоровья Студентов. Преимущества Обследования Студенческой Молодежи. Проблемы Биологии И Медицины, 1, 286-293.
  5. Ismatov, F. A. (2022). Abdullaev Tz Methods Of Application Of Single-Stage Dental Implants For Different Degrees Of Alveolar Atrophy. Web Of Scientist: International Scientific Research Journal, 3(8), 636-643.
  6. Aslidinovich, I. F., & Abdurasulovich, M. A. (2022). Structure Of Single-Stage Dental Implants For Varying Degrees Of Alveolar Atrophy. World Bulletin Of Public Health, 10, 156-159.
  7. Ismatov, F. A. (2020). Comparative Tender Characteristics Of Student Dental Health Indexes. Academicia: An International Multidisciplinary Research, (10), 11.10.5958/2249-7137.2020.01532.3
  8. Ismatov, F. A. (2023). Evaluation Of The Efficacy Of Alendronic Acid In Dental Implantation (Literature Review). American Journal Of Pediatric Medicine And Health Sciences (2993-2149), 1(7), 199-202.
  9. Aslidinovich, I. F. (2023). Assessment Of The Effectiveness Of Alendronic Acid In Dental Implants. Central Asian Journal Of Medical And Natural Science, 4(3), 1186-1188.
  10. Khasanova, L. E., & Ismatov, F. A. (2022). Indicators Of Oral Health At Students Of The City Of Samarkand. Applied Information Aspects Of Medicine (Prikladnye Informacionnye Aspekty Mediciny), 25(4), 13-19.
  11. Ismatov, F. A., & Mustafoyev, A. A. (2022). Drug Treatment With Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Jaw Alveolitis. Frontline Medical Sciences And Pharmaceutical Journal, 2(03), 88-94.10.37547/medical-fmspj-02-03-09
  12. Хасанов, Х. Ш., Исматов, Ф. А., & Мардонова, Н. П. (2022). Применение" Prf" В Качестве Остеопластического Материала При Одонтогенных Кистах Челюстных Костей. Вестник Магистратуры, (2-1 (125)), 13-14.
  13. Хасанова, Л., & Исматов, Ф. (2021). Результаты Комплексного Стоматологического Обсследования У Студентов Высших Учебных Заведений. Медицина И Инновации, 1(1), 108-112.
  14. Ismatov, F. A., & Emilievna, K. L. (2020). Criteria For Evaluating Student Dental Health Index In Accordance With The «8020» Program Methodology. The American Journal Of Medical Sciences And Pharmaceutical Research, 2(11), 99-105.10.37547/tajmspr/volume02issue11-18
  15. Zafarovich, A. T., & Aslidinovich, I. F. (2022). Use Of Single-Stage Dental Implants For Varying Degrees Of Alveolar Atrophy. Central Asian Journal Of Medical And Natural Science, 3(3), 782-786.
  16. Ibragimov, D. D., Ismatov, F. A., & Narzikulov, F. A. (2022). Results Of Complex Treatment With Eludril Antiseptic Solution. Central Asian Journal Of Medical And Natural Science, 3(3), 689-690.
  17. Ismatov, F. A., Kizi Mardonova, N. P., & Hasanov, K. S. (2022). Morphological Experiments To Improve The Effectiveness Of Postoperative Rehabilitation Of Cysts In Maxillary Bones With" Prf" Osteoplastic Material. World Bulletin Of Social Sciences, 7, 32-34.
  18. Ismatov, F., Ibragimov, D., Gaffarov, U., Iskhakova, Z., Valieva, F., & Kuchkorov, F. (2021). Assessment Of Risk Factors Influencing Dental Health In Higher Education Students. Interconf, 721-732.10.51582/interconf.19-20.02.2021.072
  19. Ismatov, F. A., & Mustafoyev, A. A. (2022). Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs In The Treatment Of Maxillary Alveolitis. The American Journal Of Medical Sciences And Pharmaceutical Research, 4(03), 29-34.10.37547/tajmspr/volume04issue03-06
  20. Гаффаров, У. Б., Шодиев, С. С., & Исматов, Ф. А. (2018). Влияние Препарата «Холисал Гель» На Послеоперационное Течение У Пациентов После Удаления Ретинированных Третьих Моляров. Ббк 56.6 С 56 Современные Достижения Стоматологии: Сборник, 37.
  21. Ismatov, A. F. Formation Of Socio-Cultural Competence Of Future Foreign Language Teachers During The Educational Process Of Higher Education.
  22. Ismatov, A. F. The Use Of Interactive Technologies In Teaching English To Part-Time Students.
  23. Хасанова, Л. Э., Исматов, Ф. А., Ибрагимов, Д. Д., & Гаффаров, У. Б. Олий Таълим Муассасалари Талабаларининг Стоматологик Ҳолатининг Ўзига Хос Хусусиятлари. Междисциплинарный Подход По Заболеваниям Органов Головы И Шеи, 182.
  24. Ismatov, F. A., Kizi Mardonova, N. P., & Hasanov, K. S. (2022). Morphological Experiments To Improve The Effectiveness Of Postoperative Rehabilitation Of Cysts In Maxillary Bones With" Prf" Osteoplastic Material. World Bulletin Of Social Sciences, 7, 32-34.
  25. Хасанова, Л. Э., & Исматов, Ф. А. (2024). Особенности Стоматологического Статуса У Студентов Высших Учебных Заведений. Multidisciplinary Journal Of Science And Technology, 4(4), 97-105.
  26. Фаррух, И. С. М. А. Т. О. В., Жумаев, О., Каримов, Х., & Шавкиддин, И. С. О. М. О. В. (2024). Важность И Безопасность Антирезорбционных Препаратов Для Успешного Проведения Стоматологической Имплантологии У Пациентов. Samarali Ta’lim Va Barqaror Innovatsiyalar Jurnali, 2(3), 374-386.
  27. Alimjanovich, R. J., Mukhamatisakovich, I. S., Isamiddinovich, K. A., & Asliddinovich, I. F. (2023). Basics Of Predicting Facial Sox Injuries In Athletes And Clinical-Immunological Prevention. Novateur Publications, (12), 1-121.
  28. Исматов, С. Ш., Угли, Т. Ҳ., & Асроров, М. Ю. (2019). Современное Состояние Отбелки Хлопкового Масла. Экономика И Социум, (1-1 (56)), 535-537.
  29. Ismatov, A. F. Formation Of Socio-Cultural Competence Of Future Foreign Language Teachers During The Educational Process Of Higher Education.
  30. Ismatov, A. F. The Use Of Interactive Technologies In Teaching English To Part-Time Students.
  31. Ismatov , F., & Umarova , Y. (2024). Some Discussions Regarding The Macrostructure And Osteointegration Of The Jaws During Dental Implantation. Conference Of Natural And Applied Sciences In Scientific Innovative Research, 1(4), 76–82. Retrieved From Https://Universalpublishings.Com/Index.Php/Cnassir/Article/View/53855
  32. Исматов Фаррух Аслидинович, & Умарова Юлдуз Аслиддиновна. (2024). Некоторые Комментарии К Метаболизму Костной Ткани И Ее Фармакологическим Свойствам. Yangi O’zbekistonda Tabiiy Va Ijtimoiy-Gumanitar Fanlar Respublika Ilmiy Amaliy Konferensiyasi, 2(4), 250–258. Retrieved From Https://Universalpublishings.Com/Index.Php/Gumanitar/Article/View/5350
  33. Исматов, Ф. (2024). Основных Стоматологических Заболеваний, Методы И Программы Профилактики У Лиц Молодого Возраста. Journal Of Science-Innovative Research In Uzbekistan, 2(8), 17–21. Retrieved From Https://Universalpublishings.Com/Index.Php/Jsiru/Article/View/6878
  34. Исматов Фаррух Аслидинович. (2024). Состояние И Методы Обследования Стоматологического Здоровья, Формирование Групп И Методы Профилактики. Scientific Journal Of Applied And Medical Sciences, 3(8), 19–24. Retrieved From Https://Sciencebox.Uz/Index.Php/Amaltibbiyot/Article/View/11645
  35. Ismatov, F. (2024). Some Problems Of Organizing Dental Care For Youth And Its Importance. Multidisciplinary Journal Of Science And Technology, 4(8), 26–30. Retrieved From Https://Mjstjournal.Com/Index.Php/Mjst/Article/View/1792
  36. Ismatov Farrukh Aslidinovich. (2024). Dental Health Of Youth In The World At The Current Stage. American Journal Of Pediatric Medicine And Health Sciences (2993-2149), 2(8), 18–22. Retrieved From Https://Grnjournal.Us/Index.Php/Ajpmhs/Article/View/5612

Metama’lumot

Identifikator
REL-A-012859
Nashr sanasi
2025-04-05
Til
inglizcha
Jurnal
Research Focus International Scientific Journal
Jild
4
Son
3
DOI
10.66073/researchfocus.v4i3.1527
ISSN
2181-3833 · 2181-3833
Nashriyot
LLC Ilm-fan va innovatsiyalar akademiyasi
Sahifa
170–176
Litsenziya
Ushbu ilmiy ish CC BY 4.0 litsenziyasi asosida ochiq.
Ko‘rishlar
12026-10-28 dan beri o‘lchanmoqda
Metadata manbasi
Research Focus International Scientific Journal
Oxirgi yangilanish
2026-09-06