<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD with MathML3 v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">legalreport</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>TSUL Legal Report</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">TSUL Legal Report</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub" publication-format="print">2181-1024</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Toshkent davlat yuridik universiteti</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.51788/tsul.lr.7.1./yore3191</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="other" assigning-authority="relibrary.uz">REL-A-014017</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title xml:lang="en">A COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS OF NATIONAL LEGAL POLICY MODELS</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="author">
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Eshturdiyeva</surname>
            <given-names>Farangiz</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-04-30">
        <day>30</day>
        <month>04</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date date-type="collection">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>7</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>4</fpage>
      <lpage>12</lpage>
      <permissions>
        <license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0">
          <ali:license_ref>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</ali:license_ref>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri xlink:href="https://relibrary.uz/REL-A-014017/"/>
      <abstract xml:lang="en">
        <p>This article provides a comparative legal analysis of the national legal policy models of the Federal Republic of Germany, the Russian Federation, the Republic of Kazakhstan, and the Republic of Belarus. The study conceptualizes legal policy as the state‘s strategic activity aimed at shaping and developing the legal system and focuses on identifying its constitutional foundations, regulatory priorities, and institutional mechanisms. The findings demonstrate that the substance and orientation of legal policy models are directly linked to a state‘s political and legal structure, the degree of separation of powers, and the system of legal values. The German model is grounded in the primacy of the rule of law state and constitutional review, whereas the Russian and Belarusian models reveal a close interconnection between legal policy and state interests, as well as political stability. The legal policy of the Republic of Kazakhstan is characterized as a transitional model that combines strategic planning with legal modernization. The article substantiates that these conclusions not only enrich legal policy theory but also hold scientific and practical significance for improving national legal systems and planning legal reform processes.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>legal policy</kwd>
        <kwd>national legal model</kwd>
        <kwd>rule of law</kwd>
        <kwd>constitutional review</kwd>
        <kwd>state–law relations</kwd>
        <kwd>regulatory legal system</kwd>
        <kwd>legal modernization</kwd>
        <kwd>comparative legal analysis</kwd>
        <kwd>legal reforms</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="r1">
        <label>1</label>
        <mixed-citation>Alexy, R. (2002). A Theory of constitutional rights. Oxford University Press.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r2">
        <label>2</label>
        <mixed-citation>Bingham, T. (2010). The rule of law. Penguin Books.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r3">
        <label>3</label>
        <mixed-citation>Dicey, A. V. (1982). Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution. Macmillan.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r4">
        <label>4</label>
        <mixed-citation>Federal Republic of Germany. (1949). The Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany. German Bundestag.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r5">
        <label>5</label>
        <mixed-citation>Federal Republic of Germany. (2020). Selected decisions on constitutional review. Federal Constitutional Court.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r6">
        <label>6</label>
        <mixed-citation>Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. MIT Press. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001</pub-id></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r7">
        <label>7</label>
        <mixed-citation>Kelsen, H. (1967). Pure theory of law. University of California Press. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1525/9780520312296</pub-id></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r8">
        <label>8</label>
        <mixed-citation>Krasnov, Y. K. (2019). Pravovaya politika Rossii na sovremennom etape[Legal policy of Russia at the current stage]. Prometey.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r9">
        <label>9</label>
        <mixed-citation>Malko, A. V. (2010). Pravovaya politika: Teoriya i praktika[Legal policy: Theory and practice]. SGAP.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r10">
        <label>10</label>
        <mixed-citation>Malko, A. V., &amp; Zatonskiy, V. A. (2015). Pravovaya politika: Osnovy teorii i praktiki[Legal policy: Fundamentals of theory and practice]. Prospekt.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r11">
        <label>11</label>
        <mixed-citation>President of the Republic of Belarus. (2023, June 28). Concept of legal policy of the Republic of Belarus (Decree No. 196).</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r12">
        <label>12</label>
        <mixed-citation>President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2021, October 15). Concept of legal policy of the Republic of Kazakhstan until 2030 (Decree No. 674).</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r13">
        <label>13</label>
        <mixed-citation>Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Rev. ed.). Harvard University Press. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4159/9780674042582</pub-id></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r14">
        <label>14</label>
        <mixed-citation>Raz, J. (1979). The authority of law: Essays on law and morality. Oxford University Press. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198253457.001.0001</pub-id></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r15">
        <label>15</label>
        <mixed-citation>Tamanaha, B. Z. (2004). On the rule of law: History, politics, theory. Cambridge University Press <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/cbo9780511812378</pub-id></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
