<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD with MathML3 v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">legalreport</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>TSUL Legal Report</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">TSUL Legal Report</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub" publication-format="print">2181-1024</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Toshkent davlat yuridik universiteti</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="other" assigning-authority="relibrary.uz">REL-A-014005</article-id>
      <title-group>
        <article-title xml:lang="en">THE MANDATORY VIDEO RECORDING OF INTERROGATIONS IN UZBEKISTAN: PERSPECTIVES AND ADVANTAGES</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="author">
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Nodirov</surname>
            <given-names>Muzaffar</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Tursunmurodov</surname>
            <given-names>Komron</given-names>
          </name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-01-01">
        <day>01</day>
        <month>01</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date date-type="collection">
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>6</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>38</fpage>
      <lpage>53</lpage>
      <permissions>
        <license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0">
          <ali:license_ref>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</ali:license_ref>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri xlink:href="https://relibrary.uz/REL-A-014005/"/>
      <abstract xml:lang="en">
        <p>This paper describes the issue of video recording interrogations, providing a thorough analysis of the experiences of several foreign countries, including Japan, the US, Canada, and Poland, as well as the opinions of scholars in this field. The paper describes two main categories of advantages the video recording of interrogations offers, both of which contain detailed analysis of several factors that contribute to the establishment of mandatory video recording of interrogations in Uzbekistan. The first category includes benefits in ensuring human rights during interrogations, and the second category focuses on the compliance of interrogations with the norms and provisions of criminal procedural legislation. Although there may be potential disadvantages to the video recording of interrogations, the authors have put a strong emphasis on the advantages this innovation offers and provided specific examples for each advantage. The authors have also suggested adding new provisions and amending the existing ones regarding the mandatory recording of interrogations in the Criminal Procedure Code of Uzbekistan in line with the analysis of foreign countries‘ experiences in this field.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>mandatory video recording</kwd>
        <kwd>interrogation</kwd>
        <kwd>videotapes</kwd>
        <kwd>compliance of interrogation</kwd>
        <kwd>human rights</kwd>
        <kwd>procedural legislation</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="r1">
        <label>1</label>
        <mixed-citation>Criminal Procedure Law. (Criminal Procedure). Tashkent, TSUL Publ., 2022, p. 211.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r2">
        <label>2</label>
        <mixed-citation>Korovin N.K. Features of using digital video recording during interrogation. Verb of justice, 2011, vol. 1(2), pp. 44–46.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r3">
        <label>3</label>
        <mixed-citation>Bajbikov R.R. Inadmissible interrogation methods: regulation under the criminal procedure legislation of Russia and foreign countries. VJePS, 2016. vol. 1. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/nedopustimye-metody-doprosa-reglamentatsiya-po- ugolovno-protsessualnomu-zakonodatelstvu-rossii-i-zarubezhnyh-stran</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r4">
        <label>4</label>
        <mixed-citation>Kholopov A.V. Use of video recording during interrogations during preliminary investigation. Forensic, 2011, vol. 1(8), pp. 73–77.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r5">
        <label>5</label>
        <mixed-citation>Sullivan T.P., Vail A.W. The consequences of law enforcement officials’ failure to record custodial interviews as required by law. J. Crim. L. &amp; Criminology, 2008, vol. 99, p. 215.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r6">
        <label>6</label>
        <mixed-citation>Cassell P.G. Protecting the innocent from false confessions and lost confessions and from miranda. J. Crim. L. &amp; Criminology, 1997, vol. 88, p. 497.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r7">
        <label>7</label>
        <mixed-citation>Leo R.A. Promoting accuracy in the use of confession evidence: An argument for pretrial reliability assessments to prevent wrongful convictions. Temp. L. Rev, 2012, vol. 85, p. 759.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r8">
        <label>8</label>
        <mixed-citation>Kerr O.S. Fourth amendment seizures of computer data. Yale LJ, 2009, vol. 119, p. 700.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r9">
        <label>9</label>
        <mixed-citation>Criminal Procedure Code of Japan, July 10, 1948. Available at: https://www. japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/2056/en#je_pt2ch3sc3at3 52 TSUL Legal Report Volume 6, ISSUE 3 (2025) E-ISSN: 2181-1024</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r10">
        <label>10</label>
        <mixed-citation>Volosova N.Ju. Reform of criminal procedure in Japan. Issues of Russian and international law, 2018, vol. 8, no. 8A, pp. 181–189.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r11">
        <label>11</label>
        <mixed-citation>Rekhovsky A.F. modern reform of the main process of Japan. Siberian criminal procedure and criminalistic readings, 2020, vol. 1(27). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/ article/n/sovremennaya-reforma-ugolovnogo-protsessa-yaponii</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r12">
        <label>12</label>
        <mixed-citation>Glushkov M.R. The Use of Video Recording in a Police Investigation in the United States. Police Activity, 2016, vol. 4, pp. 426–430.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r13">
        <label>13</label>
        <mixed-citation>Brandon G. Jurisdictions that record police interrogations. Wilson Center for Science and Justice at Duke Law Publ., 2024.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r14">
        <label>14</label>
        <mixed-citation>Burchill J., Pats E.K.J. Video Interrogation: Losing the Evidence--A Comprehensive Look at the Legal Use of Video Statements in Canada. IALEIA Journal, 2005, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 167–206.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r15">
        <label>15</label>
        <mixed-citation>Vasil’eva Ju.S. Comparative legal analysis of the interrogation of minor victims and witnesses in the criminal procedure legislation of different countries. Magistracy Bulletin, 2021, vol. 10-2(121). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sravnitelno-pravovoy- analiz-provedeniya-doprosanesovershennoletnih-poterpevshih-i-svideteley-v-ugolovno- protsessualnom</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r16">
        <label>16</label>
        <mixed-citation>Norway criminal procedure act, Section 298.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r17">
        <label>17</label>
        <mixed-citation>Ivanshina A.J. Torture as a means of inducing the accused to confess: a retrospective analysis. Legal Science and Practice: Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2018, vol. 2(42). Available at: https:// cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pytka-kak-sredstvo-stimulirovaniya-obvinyaemogo-k-dache- priznatelnyh-pokazaniy-retrospektivnyy-analiz</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r18">
        <label>18</label>
        <mixed-citation>Shepeljova O.S. Torture as a Factor in Violating the Right to a Fair Trial: A Review of the European Court of Human Rights’ Case Law in Russian Cases. International Justice, 2014, vol. 3 (11). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pytki-kak-faktor- narusheniya-prava-na-spravedlivoe-sudebnoe-razbiratelstvo-obzor-praktiki-evropeyskogo- suda-po-pravam-cheloveka-po</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r19">
        <label>19</label>
        <mixed-citation>Martin Sh.D. Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism, No. A/HRC/16/51, 2010.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r20">
        <label>20</label>
        <mixed-citation>Nasonova I.A. Participation of the defense attorney in interrogation. Bulletin of the Military Intelligence Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2009, vol. 1. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/uchastie-zaschitnika-v-doprose</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r21">
        <label>21</label>
        <mixed-citation>Jastreb D.S., Anjuhovskaja N.V. Features of the participation of the defender in the interrogation of the defendant. State regulation of public relations in the region: socio- economic, legal and historical-cultural aspects, 2022, pp. 459–463.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r22">
        <label>22</label>
        <mixed-citation>Millerov, E.V., On Some Peculiarities of a Defense Attorney’s Participation in the Questioning of a Suspect. North Caucasus Legal Bulletin, 2021, vol. 3, pp. 156–161.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r23">
        <label>23</label>
        <mixed-citation>Ponomareva V.N. Participation of the defense attorney in the interrogation of the suspect (accused).2014.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r24">
        <label>24</label>
        <mixed-citation>Lassiter G.D. Videotaping custodial interrogations. Toward a scientifically based policy. 2010.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r25">
        <label>25</label>
        <mixed-citation>Drizin S.A., Colgan B.A. Let the cameras roll: Mandatory videotaping of interrogations is the solution to Illinois’ problem of false confessions. Loy. U. Chi. LJ, 2000, vol. 32, p. 337.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r26">
        <label>26</label>
        <mixed-citation>Dixon D. Videotaping Police Interrogation. UNSW Law Research Paper, 2008, vol. 28, 2008.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r27">
        <label>27</label>
        <mixed-citation>Turgunova M. Testimony against oneself and one’s loved ones. 2022. E-ISSN: 2181-1024 Volume 6, ISSUE 3 (2025) TSUL Legal Report 53 TSUL LEGAL REPORT INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL VOLUME 6 ISSUE 3 SEPTEMBER 2025</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
