legalreport TSUL Legal Report TSUL Legal Report 2181-1024 Toshkent davlat yuridik universiteti REL-A-013994 THE SUBJECTIVE SIDE OF THE CRIME OF PROFESSIONAL FAILURE TO PERFORM ONE‘S DUTIES TO THE NECESSARY LEVEL Khaydarov Shukhratjon 01 01 2024 2024 5 3 40 49 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

This article describes the concept of the crime of failure to perform one‘s duties properly, its specific features, and the subjective aspects of the crime. The subjective side of the crime of failure to perform one‘s duties is analyzed based on the opinions of experts in criminal law. The author, employing a scientific approach to the perspectives of these scholars, illuminates his views through rigorous analysis. Additionally, the article states that representatives of various professions – including doctors, rescuers, builders, hairdressers, and electricians – are considered a special subject in this context. It reveals the signs of criminal negligence that may arise from a person‘s actions when this crime is committed carelessly. The motives and goals underlying any activity a person consciously performs are also analyzed in relation to Article 116 of the Criminal Code, along with its specific features. The crime of improperly performing one‘s duties within a professional context is discussed in terms of both subjective carelessness and intent. Furthermore, the article substantiates the need to separate the crime of improperly performing one‘s duties from that of a medical worker into a distinct article and analyzes crime statistics related to the improper performance of duties across various professions for the years 2014-2022, as well as relevant judgments examined in connection with the research. The article also provides scientifically based conclusions and suggestions for improving legal norms that govern responsibility for the crime of improper performance of one‘s duties.

 crime liability victim profession negligence dishonesty carelessness doctor fault duty patient motive purpose punishment medicine Sakhaddinov S., Muhamedov H. History of Criminal Law. Study guide. – Tashkent, TDYI, 2012, p. 300. Ogarkov I.F. Vrachebnye pravonarushenia i ugolovnaya otvetstvennost za nix [Medical offenses and criminal liability for them]. – L., 2006, pp. 9–10. Tomsinov V.A. Ugolovno-sedbnoe ulozhenie Svyashchennoy Rimskoy Imperii Germanskoi Natsii (Carolina). Khrestomatiya po istorii gosudarstva i prava zarubejnyx stran. Drevnost i srednie veka [Criminal-seventh anniversary of the Holy Roman Empire, German and Natsii (Carolina). Khrestomatiya according to the history of the state and law of foreign countries. Ancient and Middle Ages]. – M.: Zertsalo, 2004, p. 57. Mukhtorov N.I. Problems of the form of negligence in criminal law. Abstract of thesis. – Tashkent, 2009, pp. 32–33. Comments on the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan. – Tashkent, Adolat, 1997, p. 42. Abdukadirov Sh.Yo. The form of negligence and its symptoms. Study guide. – Tashkent: TDYI, 2005, p. 9. Letter No. 07/14-9743-324 of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated July 16, 2024. Rarog A.I. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossii [Criminal law of Russia]. Chasti Obshchaya i Osobennaya [General and Special parts]. – M., 2005, p. 97. Rossiyskoe ugolovnoe pravo: Uchenik v 2 t. T.1 [Russian criminal law: Student in 2 volumes. Volume 1]. Obshchaya chast / Pod ed. L.N. Inogamovoy-Hegay, V.S. Komissarova, A.I. Raroga. – M.: Prospekt, 2007, 175 p. Ivanov E.T., Mazukov S.Kh. Sub’ektivnaya strona prestupleniya [Subjective side of the crime]. – Rostov-on-Don, 1999, p. 29. Pavlov A.I. Subject presplenia [Subject of the resurrection]. – M., 2007, pp. 17–18. Chuykin V.V. Neostorojnaya vina – legkomyslie ili nebrejnost? [Careless guilt - frivolity or negligence?]. – Minsk, 1999, pp. 31–33. Karpushin M.P., Kurlyandsky V.I. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost i sostav prestupleniya [Criminal liability and the composition of the crime]. – M., 1974, pp. 68–70. Neklyudov N.P. Obshchaya chast ugolovnogo prava [General part of criminal law]. – SPb., 1875; Kistyakovskiy F.A. Uchebnik obshchego ugolovnogo prava [Textbook of General Criminal Law]. – Kiev, 1882, 365 p.; Nemirovsky E. Basic criminal law. – Odessa, 48 TSUL Legal Report Volume 5, ISSUE 3 (2024) E-ISSN: 2181-1024 1917, 367 p. Leontev O.V. Disturbance of the norms of criminal law in medicine. – SPb.: SpetsLit, 2002, p. 6. Mustafa-zadeh A. G. Classification of murder by motive and purpose: Abstract of thesis. – M., 2004, pp. 23–37.; Borisov O.A. The relationship between the object and motive of the crime: Abstract of thesis. – Volgograd, 1996, p. 12. Pechnikov N.P. Motiv i tseli, ix znachenie v ugolovnom prave Rossii [Motive and goals, their importance in the criminal law of Russia]. The course is a lecture. – Tambov: TGTU, 2009, 64 p.; Borisov O. A. Znachenie motiva pri razgranichenii smejnyx sostavov prestupleniy // Humanitarnye i estestvennye nauki v Nizhnevoljskom regione [The Importance of Motive in Distinguishing Related Crimes // Humanities and Natural Sciences in the Lower Volga Region]. – Volgograd, 1995, pp. 50–51.; Sklyarov S. V. Motivy individualogo prestupnogo povedeniya i ix ugolovno-pravovoe znachenie [Motives of individual criminal behavior and their criminal-legal significance. Abstract of thesis. – Irkutsk, 1995, p. 8. Analysis of materials of 30 criminal cases in the Republic. Letter of the General Prosecutor’s Office of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated October 19, 2019 No. 30/16-19-2658. E-ISSN: 2181-1024 Volume 5, ISSUE 3 (2024) TSUL Legal Report 49