legalreport TSUL Legal Report TSUL Legal Report 2181-1024 Toshkent davlat yuridik universiteti 10.51788/tsul.lr.4.4./aaty5085 REL-A-013982 Judicial verdict in the Romano-German legal system: analysis of procedural aspects Alishaev Sobir 01 01 2023 2023 4 4 30 37 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

This scientific article analyzes the procedural aspects of a court sentence within the framework of the Romano-Germanic legal system. The structure of the court sentence, its role in law enforcement, as well as its impact on judicial practice and society as a whole are considered. A comparative analysis of court sentences in the Romano-Germanic and general legal systems also highlights the features of this system.

 Judicial verdict Romano-Germanic legal system procedural aspects structure of the judicial verdict precedents judicial practice judicial proceedings justice trials Jean Carbonnier - “Flexible droit: Pour une sociologie du droit sans rigueur”., LGDJ, 2001, 490 p. René David и Camille Jauffret-Spinosi - “Les grands systèmes de droit contemporains”., Paris, Dalloz, 1992, 523 p. Otto Kahn-Freund - “An Introduction to the Law of the United Nations”., 1972 p. 56 et seq., 132. Tony Weir - “German Law and German Legal Methods”., The Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 38, No. 1 (Apr., 1979), pp. 205–207. 10.1017/s0008197300093867 Mauro Cappelletti и Joseph Weiler - “Integration Through Law: Europe and the American Federal Experience” International Journal of Constitutional Law, Volume 14, Issue 2, April 2016, pp. 449–463, Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mow024; “Comparative Law” by Mathias Siems., January 2016, Edinburgh Law Review 20(1):109-111, DOI:10.3366/elr.2016.0332; “Introduction to European Legal History” by Wolfgang Kaiser., 3rd ed. (London, Edinburgh, Dubli . (Berlin and New York, 1987), p. 719. “European Legal Cultures” by Jan M. Smits., Dartmouth. Aldershot. 1996. “The Common Law Tradition: A Collective Portrait of Five Legal Scholars” by Karl N. Llewellyn, Jerome Michael, and Karl Llewellyn, Jr., Taming the Past, Essays on Law in History and History in Law, pp. 15–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108147668 Tumanov V.A. Sravnitel’naya yurisprudentsiya [Comparative jurisprudence]. Samara: Samara university. 2016. p. 80. Kozyrev A.A. Sravnitel’noye pravo [Comparative law]. Legal world. – 2003. – No 5. pp. 43–51. Ugolovno-protsessual’nyy kodeks Respubliki Uzbekistan v redaktsii Zakona NoORQ-683 ot 21 aprelya 2021 goda — Natsional’naya baza zakonodatel’noy informatsii [Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2021 April 21], 21.04.2021 y., 03/21/683/0375-son, Available at: https://lex.uz/docs/111460 10.37547/tajiir/volume03issue04-04 Postanovleniye Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Uzbekistan “O sudebnom provore” [Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On the Judicial Sentence”]. 23.05.2014 года, No 7. Available at: https://lex.uz/uz/docs/2413562; Alishayev S.T. Sudedbnoye resheniye: zakonnost’, spravedlivost’ i bespristrastnost [Judgment: legality, justice and impartiality]. Herald pedagogy. Science and Practice. – 2022. – T. 2. – No. 2. Alishayev S.T. Problems of compilation and officialization of the court judgment // E Conference Zone. – 2022. pp. 176–179. Alishayev S.T. Verdict as the final document of justice // E Conference Zone. – 2022. pp. 171–175. Alishayev S.T. Osobennosti vyneseniya sudebnogo prigovora i anglo-saksonskoy pravovoy sistemy [Features of court sentence in the anglo-saxon legal system]. Gospodarka and innovation. – 2023. – Т. 39. pp. 26–35.