legalreport

TSUL Legal Report

2181-1024

Toshkent davlat yuridik universiteti

10.51788/tsul.lr.4.3./mrtg2632

REL-A-013978

PECULIAR FEATURES OF EVIDENCE AT THE TERMINATION OF A CRIMINAL CASE

Makhmudov

Sunnatjon

01 01 2023

2023

4 3 26 32 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

This article analyzes the importance of proof and its features at the stage of termination of a criminal case based on the norms of criminal and criminal procedure legislation at the implementation stage of judicial reform. The article studies this institution‘s scope through the views scientists expressed on proving when closing a criminal case. Based on the views and ideas put forward by scientists, the issue of proof in the termination of a criminal case is analyzed through scientific, theoretical, practical, and legal norms.The article analyzes the grounds for terminating a criminal case through a comparative analysis of the opinions of scientists on the issue of proving when terminating a criminal case. Based on the analysis results, conclusions, proposals, and recommendations aimed at improving the evidence in the termination of a criminal case have been developed.

guilty termination of a criminal case rehabilitation termination of a criminal case on non-rehabilitation grounds term of bringing to responsibility suspect accused defendant victim victim statement

Decision PD-3723 dated May 14, 2018, of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On measures to improve the criminal and criminal procedural legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan”. National database of legal documents, 15.05.2018, No. 07/18/3723/1225. Available at: https://lex.uz/docs/3735818

Criminal process: General part. Tutorial in 2 parts. Part II / Compiled by U.A. Tukhtashev. – T., 2007. p. 281).

Radchenko V.I. Career: from investigator to first deputy chairman of the Supreme Court of Russia. Memoirs //Monitoring of law enforcement. 2012. – No. 3. pp. 57–63.

Muradov B.B. Improvement of the institution of termination of a criminal case. Dissertation written for the degree of Doctor of Science in Legal Sciences. – Tashkent. 2018. p. 78).

Fedyunin, A. E. The culture of rule-making in the field of legislative regulation of the institution of rehabilitation in criminal proceedings as a guarantee of ensuring the rights and legitimate interests of participants in the criminal process / A. E. Fedyunin, N. M. Peretyatko // Legal Culture. 2020. – No. 4 (43). pp. 70–81).

Some issues of dismissal of criminal cases in connection with the expiration of the limitation period for criminal responsibility. Lawyer Herald. 2022. – T. 1. – No. 1. pp. 96–102).

Lavnov M. Institute of termination of criminal proceedings in the system of criminal procedural law and law enforcement practice. Dissertation for the degree of candidate of legal sciences. Saratov. 2015. pp. 88–90.

The criminal investigation process volume iii: observations and analysis October 1975, pp. 70–71.

Smyr A. Modernization of the grounds for terminating a criminal case and criminal prosecution in the legislation of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Abkhazia. Dissertation for the degree of candidate of legal sciences. Volgograd-2019. pp. 80–85.

The team of authors. Criminal procedural law [Text]: textbook. — Tashkent: Complex Print, 2020. p. 492).

A short guide to the criminal justice system. Research Briefing Number 9331 by Joe Ryan 11 January 2022. p. 12.

Criminal procedure code of the Republic of Armenia. Available at: http://parliament.am/law_docs/010998HO248eng.pdf?lang

Kazarin D.M., Ryabchikov V.V. Rehabilitative and non-rehabilitative grounds for the suspension of criminal cases and criminal prosecution: pravoprimenitelnoy practical // Scientific and educational journal for students and teachers “Student” No. 2/2022).

Muradov B.B. Improvement of the institution of termination of a criminal case. Dissertation written for the degree of Doctor of Science in Legal Sciences. Tashkent. 2018. p. 78).

Criminal law. General part: Textbook / R. Kabilov, A.A. Atajonov et al.-T.: Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2012. p. 448).