legalreport TSUL Legal Report TSUL Legal Report 2181-1024 Toshkent davlat yuridik universiteti 10.51788/tsul.lr.3.2./pptu6102 REL-A-013963 PROBLEMS WITH REDUCING THE AMOUNT OF PENALTY (NEUSTOYKA) BY THE COURT Omonov Anvarjon Badriddinov Boburkhon 01 01 2022 2022 3 2 41 48 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Ensuring the fulfillment of contractual obligations is now of paramount importance. Therefore, it is more important than ever to do research on this issue. This article discusses ways to secure an obligation. in particular, the concept of neustoyka, in which the views of scientists are presented. forms of penalty (neustoyka) and its legal nature are discussed. It also considers the theoretical and practical aspects of the problem of reducing the amount of fines, which is currently the subject of heated debate in the Republic of Uzbekistan (Article 326 of Civil Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan), gives examples from court practice and compares with foreign experience. Reducing the amount of penalty (neustoyka) by the courts suggests the prevention of possible corruption cases and a reasonable solution to the problem. including proposals for the revision of Article 326 of Civil Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan, which shall be stated by reasoned opinions. Moreover, aspects that can be drawn from foreign experience are discussed.

 methods of enforcement penalty (neustoyka) fines “Pacta sunt servanda” reduction of penalty Имомов Н.Ф. (2014) Ипотека кредити шартномаси бўйича мажбуриятлар ижросини таъминлашнинг фуқаролик ҳуқуқий масалалри. ТДЮУ, p.12. Свириденко О.М.(1999) Обеспечение кредитных обязателстьв. Филинь, p.12 Гримм Д . Д .(2003) Лекции по догме римского права. Зерцало, p.496. “On contracting and legal basis of activity of business entities”, Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan, оn 29.08.1998 y. No 670-I The Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Economic Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On some issues of application of civil legislation on property liability for non-performance or improper performance of obligations”, No. 163 of 15.06.2007 Гонгало Б.М. (2004) Учение об обеспечении обязательств. Вопросы теории и практики. Статут, p.222 . Шершеневич Г. Ф. (1995) Учебник русского гражданского права. p.293. Гришин Д.А. (2005) Неустойка: теория, практика, законодательство. Статут, p.170. Ўзбекистон Республикаси Фуқаролик кодексига шарҳ (2010). 1-жилд (биринчи қисм) Адлия вазирлиги. Vektor-Press, p.620. «On some issues of application of civil legislation on property liability for non-performance or improper performance of obligations», resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Economic Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan, No. 163 of June 15, 2007 Чичеров Л. (2007) 2004 Неустойка в гражданском обороте и судебной практике // Арбитражный и гражданский процесс. No 5, p.p.18–27. Principles of European Contract Law. Part I and II. Prepared by the Commission on European Contract Law. Edited by O. Lando and H. Beale (2000) // Kluwer Law Int., The Hague, p. 456. Осипов М. Ю. (2022) Проблемы снижения неустойки российскими судами // Актуальные проблемы российского права, p.p.116–122. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-snizheniya-neustoyki-rossiyskimi-sudami Еремина В.И. (2019) Основания снижения неустойки судом (ст. 333 гк рф) . Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osnovaniya-snizheniya-neustoyki-sudom-st-333-gk-rf