research-focus Research Focus International Scientific Journal Research Focus 2181-3833 Ilm-fan va innovatsiyalar akademiyasi 10.66073/researchfocus.v3i5.2700 REL-A-013636 13.00.00 SOCIOLINGUISTIC PROFILE RESEARCH PAPER ИССЛЕДОВАТЕЛЬСКАЯ РАБОТА ПО СОЦИОЛИНГВИСТИЧЕСКОМУ ПРОФИЛЮ SOTSIOLINGVISTIK PROFIL BO‘YICHA TADQIQOT ISHI Davron Begmatov Tashkent Institute of Chemical Technology, Faculty of Management and Professional education, ESL teacher 05 06 2024 2024 3 5 114 119 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This research paper explores the sociolinguistic profile of two subgroups of learners, consisting of Uzbek and Indian students, and their learning context in an international school in Tashkent. The study examines the language background, proficiency level, motivation, attitudes, and beliefs towards the target language of the students. The pedagogical and assessment implications of the sociolinguistic profile are discussed to enhance language teaching and learning. The findings reveal the strengths, weaknesses, and challenges faced by the learners in acquiring the target language, providing insights for designing appropriate teaching materials, activities, and assessments tailored to their needs and goals.

В данной исследовательской работе исследуется социолингвистический профиль двух подгрупп учащихся, состоящих из узбекских и индийских студентов, и контекст их обучения в международной школе в Ташкенте. В исследовании изучаются языковой фон, уровень владения языком, мотивация, отношение и убеждения учащихся в отношении целевого языка. Обсуждаются педагогические и оценочные последствия социолингвистического профиля для улучшения преподавания и изучения языка. Результаты раскрывают сильные и слабые стороны и проблемы, с которыми сталкиваются учащиеся при изучении целевого языка, предоставляя информацию для разработки соответствующих учебных материалов, мероприятий и оценок, адаптированных к их потребностям и целям.

Ushbu tadqiqot ishida Toshkentdagi xalqaro maktabda o‘zbek va hind talabalaridan iborat ikki kichik guruh o‘quvchilarining sotsiolingvistik profili hamda ularning ta‘lim konteksti o‘rganiladi. Tadqiqotda talabalarning lingvistik tajribasi, til bilish darajasi, motivatsiyasi, o‘rganilayotgan tilga nisbatan munosabati va qarashlari tahlil qilinadi. Til o‘qitish va o‘rganishni takomillashtirish maqsadida sotsiolingvistik profilning pedagogik va baholashga oid xulosalari muhokama qilinadi. Natijalar o‘quvchilarning o‘rganilayotgan tilni o‘zlashtirishdagi kuchli va zaif tomonlarini hamda duch keladigan qiyinchiliklarini ochib beradi va ularning ehtiyojlari hamda maqsadlariga moslashtirilgan tegishli o‘quv materiallari, mashg‘ulotlar va baholash vositalarini ishlab chiqish uchun foydali ma‘lumotlar beradi.

 Sociolinguistics language teaching language learning learners‘ profile learning context pedagogical implications assessment implications teaching strategies language proficiency социолингвистика преподавание языка изучение языка профиль учащегося контекст обучения педагогические последствия последствия оценки стратегии обучения владение языком Sotsiolingvistika til o‘qitish til o‘rganish o‘quvchilar profili ta‘lim konteksti pedagogik xulosalar baholashga oid xulosalar o‘qitish strategiyalari til bilish darajasi Calder, L. (2020). Language, gender, and sexuality. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Sociolinguistics (pp. 265-279). Routledge. Cambridge English Language Assessment. (n.d.). Why take Cambridge English exams? https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/why-choose-us/benefits-of-cambridge-english-exams/. Chen, S. X., Lam, B. C. P., Schroeder, R. G., & Dou, J. (2015). The impact of creating a culture of honesty on academic integrity in business schools. Journal of Academic Ethics, 13(3), 271- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-015-9237-1. Cummins, J. (2008). BICS and CALP: Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction. In B. Street & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., pp. 71-83). Springer. Deumert, A. (2011). Multilingualism. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1-8). Wiley-Blackwell. Krashen, S., & Terrell, T. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Pergamon Press. Mesthrie, R. (2009). Introduction to sociolinguistics. Edinburgh University Press. Rickford, J. R., & McNair-Knox, F. (2014). Additive education in multilingual contexts. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (2nd ed., pp. 183-199). Routledge. Savignon, S. J. (2002). Communicative language teaching: Linguistic theory and classroom practice. In S. M. Gass & J. Neu (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 469- Schilling, M. (2010). Language, gender, and sexuality. In K. Hall & M. Bucholtz (Eds.), Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self (pp. 139-161). Routledge. Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). New standards-based assessment and grading practices. Educational Leadership, 72(1), 10-16. Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, J. (2014). An introduction to sociolinguistics (7th ed.). Wiley- Blackwell.