<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD with MathML3 v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="uz">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">research-focus</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Research Focus International Scientific Journal</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Research Focus</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub" publication-format="electronic">2181-3833</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Ilm-fan va innovatsiyalar akademiyasi</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.66073/researchfocus.v5i5.2256</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="other" assigning-authority="relibrary.uz">REL-A-013386</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="oak">
          <subject>13.00.00</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title xml:lang="uz">RAQAMLI TA‘LIM MUHITIDA BO‘LAJAK CHET TIL O‘QITUVCHILARINING TANQIDIY FIKRLASH MALAKASINI TAKOMILLASHTIRISH: DIAGNOSTIKA, MEZONLAR VA TAJRIBA-SINOV NATIJALARI</article-title>
        <trans-title-group xml:lang="en">
          <trans-title>IMPROVING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS OF FUTURE FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHERS IN THE DIGITAL EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT: DIAGNOSTICS, CRITERIA, AND EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS</trans-title>
        </trans-title-group>
        <trans-title-group xml:lang="ru">
          <trans-title>СОВЕРШЕНСТВОВАНИЕ НАВЫКА КРИТИЧЕСКОГО МЫШЛЕНИЯ БУДУЩИХ УЧИТЕЛЕЙ ИНОСТРАННОГО ЯЗЫКА В ЦИФРОВОЙ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНОЙ СРЕДЕ: ДИАГНОСТИКА, КРИТЕРИИ И РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ ОПЫТНО-ЭКСПЕРИМЕНТАЛЬНОЙ РАБОТЫ</trans-title>
        </trans-title-group>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="author">
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>o‘g‘li</surname>
            <given-names>Ismoiljonov Shuxratjon Boymirza</given-names>
          </name>
          <aff>Pedagogika fanlari nomzodi, dotsent, Namangan davlat chet tillari instituti</aff>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-06-05">
        <day>05</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date date-type="collection">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>5</volume>
      <issue>5</issue>
      <fpage>98</fpage>
      <lpage>104</lpage>
      <permissions>
        <license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0">
          <ali:license_ref>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref>
          <license-p>Ushbu asar Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International litsenziyasi asosida litsenziyalangan.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri xlink:href="https://relibrary.uz/REL-A-013386/"/>
      <abstract xml:lang="uz">
        <p>Ushbu maqolada raqamli ta‘lim muhitida bo‘lajak chet til o‘qituvchilarining tanqidiy fikrlash malakasini takomillashtirish maqsadida o‘tkazilgan keng ko‘lamli tajriba-sinov ishlarining metodologiyasi, natijalari va ilmiy-amaliy xulosalari bayon etiladi. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining 6 ta oliy ta‘lim muassasasini qamrab olgan, jami 463 nafar talaba ishtirokidagi kvazi-eksperimental tadqiqotda CTDF (Critical Thinking Development Framework) modeli sinovdan o‘tkazildi. Tadqiqot natijalari tajriba guruhi talabalarining tanqidiy fikrlash malakasi barcha besh mezon bo‘yicha statistik jihatdan ahamiyatli darajada o‘sganligini ko‘rsatdi (p</p>
      </abstract>
      <trans-abstract xml:lang="en">
        <p>This article presents the methodology, results, and scientific-practical conclusions of a large-scale experimental study conducted to improve the critical thinking skills of future foreign language teachers in a digital educational environment. The CTDF (Critical Thinking Development Framework) model was tested in a quasi-experimental study involving 463 students from 6 higher education institutions of the Republic of Uzbekistan. The results showed that the students in the experimental group demonstrated a statistically significant increase in critical thinking skills across all five criteria (p &lt; 0.001; Cohen d = 1.47–1.68).</p>
      </trans-abstract>
      <trans-abstract xml:lang="ru">
        <p>В данной статье изложены методология, результаты и научно-практические выводы широкомасштабной опытно-экспериментальной работы, проведенной с целью совершенствования навыка критического мышления будущих учителей иностранного языка в цифровой образовательной среде. В квазиэкспериментальном исследовании, охватившем 6 высших образовательных учреждений Республики Узбекистан и 463 студента, была апробирована модель CTDF (Critical Thinking Development Framework). Результаты исследования показали статистически значимый рост навыка критического мышления студентов экспериментальной группы по всем пяти критериям (p &lt; 0,001; Cohen d = 1,47–1,68).</p>
      </trans-abstract>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="uz">
        <kwd>tanqidiy fikrlash</kwd>
        <kwd>raqamli ta‘lim muhiti</kwd>
        <kwd>CTDF modeli</kwd>
        <kwd>chet til o‘qituvchisi diagnostika</kwd>
        <kwd>pedagogik tajriba</kwd>
        <kwd>AI savodxonligi</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>critical thinking</kwd>
        <kwd>digital educational environment</kwd>
        <kwd>CTDF model</kwd>
        <kwd>foreign language teacher</kwd>
        <kwd>diagnostics</kwd>
        <kwd>pedagogical experiment</kwd>
        <kwd>AI literacy</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="ru">
        <kwd>критическое мышление</kwd>
        <kwd>цифровая образовательная среда</kwd>
        <kwd>модель CTDF</kwd>
        <kwd>учитель иностранного языка</kwd>
        <kwd>диагностика</kwd>
        <kwd>педагогический эксперимент</kwd>
        <kwd>AI- грамотность</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="r1">
        <label>1</label>
        <mixed-citation>Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. Longmans.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r2">
        <label>2</label>
        <mixed-citation>Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction (Delphi Report). American Philosophical Association.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r3">
        <label>3</label>
        <mixed-citation>Paul, R., &amp; Elder, L. (2020). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools (8th ed.). Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r4">
        <label>4</label>
        <mixed-citation>Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (5th ed.). Psychology Press.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r5">
        <label>5</label>
        <mixed-citation>Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r6">
        <label>6</label>
        <mixed-citation>Long, D. &amp; Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r7">
        <label>7</label>
        <mixed-citation>Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r8">
        <label>8</label>
        <mixed-citation>Watson, G., &amp; Glaser, E. M. (2012). Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal manual. Pearson.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r9">
        <label>9</label>
        <mixed-citation>Puentedura, R. R. (2006). Transformation, technology, and education. http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r10">
        <label>10</label>
        <mixed-citation>Mishra, P., &amp; Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
