research-focus Research Focus International Scientific Journal Research Focus 2181-3833 Ilm-fan va innovatsiyalar akademiyasi 10.66073/researchfocus.v5i1.1970 REL-A-013279 13.00.00 TIBBIY TA‘LIMDA AN‘ANAVIY VA SIKL (BLOK) ASOSIDA O‘QITISH TIZIMLARINING QIYOSIY TAHLILI: AFZALLIKLAR VA KAMCHILIKLAR A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TRADITIONAL AND CYCLE (BLOCK) BASED TEACHING SYSTEMS IN MEDICAL EDUCATION: ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES СРАВНИТЕЛЬНЫЙ АНАЛИЗ ТРАДИЦИОННОЙ И ЦИКЛОВОЙ (БЛОЧНОЙ) СИСТЕМ ОБУЧЕНИЯ В МЕДИЦИНСКОМ ОБРАЗОВАНИИ: ПРЕИМУЩЕСТВА И НЕДОСТАТКИ Inomov Kodirxon Saidmamatovich University of Business and Science Tibbiyot fakulteti, Tibbiyot kafedrasi katta o‘qituvchisi 05 02 2026 2026 5 1 113 117 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Ushbu asar Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International litsenziyasi asosida litsenziyalangan.

Ushbu tadqiqot tibbiy ta‘lim jarayonida an‘anaviy (semestr davomida parallel fanlar) va sikl (blok/modul) tizimlarining samaradorligini qiyosiy tahlil qilishga bag‘ishlangan. Tadqiqot "University of Business and Science" Tibbiyot fakulteti, Davolash ishi yo‘nalishining 23-01 (an‘anaviy) va 23-02 (sikl) guruhlari talabalari ishtirokida o‘tkazildi. Tadqiqot metodologiyasi o‘zlashtirish ko‘rsatkichlari (GPA) tahlili va talabalar o‘rtasida o‘tkazilgan so‘rovnomalarni o‘z ichiga oladi. Natijalar shuni ko‘rsatdiki, sikl tizimi klinik fanlarni chuqur o‘zlashtirish va diqqatni jamlashda ustunlikka ega bo‘lsa, an‘anaviy tizim fundamental bilimlarni uzoq muddatli xotirada saqlash va fanlararo integratsiyada o‘ziga xos afzalliklarga ega. Maqolada ikkala tizimning ijobiy va salbiy tomonlari yoritilib, gibrid yondashuvni qo‘llash bo‘yicha tavsiyalar berilgan.

This research is devoted to a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of the traditional (parallel subjects during the semester) and cycle (block/module) systems of instruction in medical education. The research was conducted with the participation of the students of groups 23-01 (traditional) and 23-02 (cycle) of the General Medicine programme of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Business and Science. The research methodology includes an analysis of academic performance indicators (GPA) and questionnaires conducted among the students. The results showed that the cycle system has an advantage in the in-depth mastery of clinical subjects and in the concentration of attention, whereas the traditional system has its own advantages in retaining fundamental knowledge in long-term memory and in interdisciplinary integration. The article describes the positive and negative aspects of both systems and gives recommendations on applying a hybrid approach.

Данное исследование посвящено сравнительному анализу эффективности традиционной (параллельные предметы в течение семестра) и цикловой (блочно-модульной) систем обучения в медицинском образовании. Исследование проводилось с участием студентов групп 23-01 (традиционная) и 23-02 (цикловая) направления «Лечебное дело» медицинского факультета "University of Business and Science". Методология исследования включает анализ показателей успеваемости (GPA) и анкетирование студентов. Результаты показали, что цикловая система имеет преимущество в углубленном освоении клинических дисциплин и концентрации внимания, тогда как традиционная система обладает уникальными преимуществами в сохранении фундаментальных знаний в долгосрочной памяти и междисциплинарной интеграции. В статье освещаются плюсы и минусы обеих систем, а также даются рекомендации по применению гибридного подхода.

 tibbiy ta‘lim an‘anaviy o‘qitish sikl tizimi modulli o‘qitish akademik o‘zlashtirish University of Business and Science medical education traditional teaching cycle system modular teaching academic achievement University of Business and Science медицинское образование традиционное обучение цикловая система модульное обучение академическая успеваемость University of Business and Science Harden, R. M. (2000). The integration ladder: a tool for curriculum planning and evaluation. Medical Education, 34(7), 551-557. Frank, J. R., & Danoff, D. (2007). The CanMEDS initiative: implementing an outcomes-based framework of physician competencies. Medical Teacher, 29(7), 642-647. Ibragimov, A. A., & Rahmatullayev, S. R. (2022). O‘zbekiston tibbiyot oliy o‘quv yurtlarida kredit-modul tizimining joriy etilishi: muammolar va yechimlar. Tibbiyot va Ta’lim, 4(2), 15-20. Dent, J. A., & Harden, R. M. (2013). A Practical Guide for Medical Teachers. Elsevier Health Sciences. Van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (1996). The utility of case-based reasoning in medical education. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 1(1), 15-25. Karimov, Sh. I. (2019). Tibbiy ta’limdagi islohotlar va ularning samaradorligi. O‘zbekiston Tibbiyot Jurnali, 11, 3-8. Schmidt, H. G., & bilgin, I. (2009). Problem-based learning in medical education: A review of the literature. Academic Medicine, 84(10), 1420-1428. Mamasoliyev, K., & Norboyev, Z. (2024). Klinik fanlarni o‘qitishda intensiv sikl usullarining ahamiyati. Central Asian Journal of Medicine, 3, 45-50. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Sog‘liqni saqlash vazirligi. (2023). "Tibbiy ta’limni modernizatsiya qilish konsepsiyasi". Toshkent.