<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD with MathML3 v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">research-focus</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Research Focus International Scientific Journal</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Research Focus</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub" publication-format="electronic">2181-3833</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Ilm-fan va innovatsiyalar akademiyasi</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.66073/researchfocus.v4i11.1847</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="other" assigning-authority="relibrary.uz">REL-A-013163</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="oak">
          <subject>13.00.00</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title xml:lang="en">FOUNDATIONS OF EVALUATION TECHNOLOGY FOR THE ACTIVITIES OF PROFESSORS AND TEACHERS IN HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS</article-title>
        <trans-title-group xml:lang="ru">
          <trans-title>ОСНОВЫ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ ОЦЕНКИ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ПРОФЕССОРОВ И ПРЕПОДАВАТЕЛЕЙ ВЫСШИХ УЧЕБНЫХ ЗАВЕДЕНИЙ</trans-title>
        </trans-title-group>
        <trans-title-group xml:lang="uz">
          <trans-title>OLIY TA‘LIM MUASSASALARI PROFESSOR-O‘QITUVCHILARI FAOLIYATINI BAHOLASH TEXNOLOGIYASINING ASOSLARI</trans-title>
        </trans-title-group>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="author">
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Urakov Sherzod Raxmanovich</string-name>
          <aff>Doctor of Sciences in Pedagogy (DSc), Associate Professor.</aff>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Faxriddinov Muhammad Faxriddin o‘g‘li</string-name>
          <aff>Samarkand State Pedagogical Institute, PhD Candidate.</aff>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-12-05">
        <day>05</day>
        <month>12</month>
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date date-type="collection">
        <year>2025</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>4</volume>
      <issue>11</issue>
      <fpage>154</fpage>
      <lpage>156</lpage>
      <permissions>
        <license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0">
          <ali:license_ref>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref>
          <license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri xlink:href="https://relibrary.uz/REL-A-013163/"/>
      <abstract xml:lang="en">
        <p>This article analyzes the evaluation technology, criteria, and indicators of the pedagogical activities of professors and teachers in higher education institutions. It provides information on modern forms and methods of assessment, including digital evaluation systems, student opinion-based monitoring, peer expertise, and self-assessment mechanisms. Furthermore, it substantiates the diagnostic, motivational, and developmental functions of assessment in improving educational quality.</p>
      </abstract>
      <trans-abstract xml:lang="ru">
        <p>В данной статье анализируются технологии оценки педагогической деятельности преподавателей в учебном процессе высших учебных заведений, критерии и индикаторы оценки. Представляются современные формы и методы оценки, включая цифровые системы оценки, мониторинг на основе мнения студентов, экспертизу коллег и механизмы самооценки. Также обосновываются диагностические, стимулирующие и развивающие функции оценки в повышении качества образования.</p>
      </trans-abstract>
      <trans-abstract xml:lang="uz">
        <p>Ushbu maqolada oliy ta‘lim muassasalarida professor-o‘qituvchilarning pedagogik faoliyatini baholash texnologiyasi, mezonlari va indikatorlari tahlil qilinadi. Unda baholashning zamonaviy shakl va usullari, jumladan raqamli baholash tizimlari, talabalar fikriga asoslangan monitoring, hamkasblar ekspertizasi va o‘z-o‘zini baholash mexanizmlari haqida ma‘lumot berilgan. Bundan tashqari, ta‘lim sifatini oshirishda baholashning diagnostik, rag‘batlantiruvchi va rivojlantiruvchi funksiyalari asoslab berilgan.</p>
      </trans-abstract>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>Evaluation technology</kwd>
        <kwd>higher education</kwd>
        <kwd>professor</kwd>
        <kwd>teacher</kwd>
        <kwd>pedagogical activity</kwd>
        <kwd>lesson</kwd>
        <kwd>educational quality</kwd>
        <kwd>indicators</kwd>
        <kwd>digital monitoring</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="ru">
        <kwd>Технология оценки</kwd>
        <kwd>высшее образование</kwd>
        <kwd>преподаватель</kwd>
        <kwd>педагогическая деятельность</kwd>
        <kwd>учебный процесс</kwd>
        <kwd>качество образования</kwd>
        <kwd>индикатор</kwd>
        <kwd>цифровой мониторинг</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="uz">
        <kwd>Baholash texnologiyasi</kwd>
        <kwd>oliy ta‘lim</kwd>
        <kwd>professor</kwd>
        <kwd>o‘qituvchi</kwd>
        <kwd>pedagogik faoliyat</kwd>
        <kwd>dars</kwd>
        <kwd>ta‘lim sifati</kwd>
        <kwd>indikatorlar</kwd>
        <kwd>raqamli monitoring</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="r1">
        <label>1</label>
        <mixed-citation>Decree No. PQ–5847 of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan on &quot;The Concept for the Development of the Higher Education System until 2030.&quot;</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r2">
        <label>2</label>
        <mixed-citation>Law on &quot;Education,&quot; September 23, 2020.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r3">
        <label>3</label>
        <mixed-citation>OECD (2021). Teacher Evaluation: A Conceptual Framework. Paris.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r4">
        <label>4</label>
        <mixed-citation>UNESCO (2020). Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Higher Education.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r5">
        <label>5</label>
        <mixed-citation>Abdullayev, S. (2022). Theoretical Foundations of Pedagogical Assessment Technologies. Tashkent: Fan Publishing House.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="r6">
        <label>6</label>
        <mixed-citation>Rasulov, M. (2023). Innovative Assessment Systems in Higher Education. Samarkand: SDU Publishing House.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
